
DRG付费下康复病组存在的问题及优化
吕梦宇, 张莹莹, 刘旺, 张玉蕊, 王孝勇
百度开云体育app(山东省医学科学院)学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6) : 349-354.
DRG付费下康复病组存在的问题及优化
Problems and optimization of the rehabilitation group under DRG payment
目的 分析疾病诊断相关分组(diagnosis related groups,DRG)付费下康复病组的支付现状,发现问题并进行优化处理。 方法 采用K⁃W检验,对3类不同级别医疗结构的康复相关DRG病组XR1(康复)、XR29(其他康复治疗)和经康复治疗的神经系统疾病病组BW29(脑性麻痹)的医疗总费用、DRG支付差、次均住院费用、平均住院日和重复住院率进行统计分析。 结果 康复相关DRG病组虽总体上略有盈余,但BW29亏损严重,其平均住院日长、重复住院率高;3类医疗机构间康复相关DRG病组在次均住院差、次均住院费用和平均住院日上的差异均具有统计学意义(P 均< 0.001)。 结论 优化康复治疗的医保支付、与长期护理保险等制度有机衔接和建立基于价值医疗的复合式医保支付方式是推进我国康复医学的高质量发展的必由之路。
Objective To analyze the payment status of the rehabilitation disease group under diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment, problems were identified and optimized, thereby providing a basis for the standardized enrollment of rehabilitation treatment and the improvement of medical insurance payment policies. Methods The K-W test was used to statistically analyze the total medical expenses, DRG payment differences, average out-of-pocket expenses, average length of staying, and readmission rates for rehabilitation-related DRG disease groups XR1 (rehabilitation), XR29 (other rehabilitation treatments), and BW29 (cerebral palsy) in three different levels of hospitals. Results Although the overall revenue for the the rehabilitation-related DRG disease groups is slightly positive, BW29 shows significant losses, with longer average lengths of staying and higher readmission rates. The differences in the average hospitalization difference, average hospitalization cost and average length of staying among the three types of medical institutions in the rehabilitation-related DRG disease groups were all statistically significant (all P < 0.001). Conclusion Along with a composite payment method based on value-based healthcare, optimizing medical insurance payments for rehabilitation treatments and establishing a connection with long-term care insurance systems is essential for promoting high-quality development in rehabilitation medicine in China.
diagnosis related groups / reform of medical insurance payment methods / rehabilitation medicine
[1] | 国务院办公厅.国务院办公厅关于进一步深化基本医疗保险支付方式改革的指导意见[EB/OL].(2017-6-18)[2024-12-13].. |
[2] | 国家医疗保障局.国家医疗保障局关于印发DRG/DIP 支付方式改革三年行动计划的通知[EB/OL].(2021-11-19)[2024-12-13].. |
[3] | 柯珊红,明平勇. 康复医学科常见主要诊断编码错误案例分析[J]. 中国病案,2022,23(7):44. |
[4] | 林坚,吴馨,何莹莹,等.神经类康复病种按床日付费政策建议研究——以KF医院为例[J].经济师,2024,(10):226. |
[5] | 支梦佳,胡琳琳. 美国基于功能相关分类法的康复医保支付方式及对我国的启示[J]. 中国卫生经济,2021,40(7):87. |
[6] | 孙燕,励建安,张晓. 美国老年人住院康复医疗支付政策与启示[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2009,24(8):747. |
[7] | 闫润楠,颜穆丹,胡琳琳,等. 澳大利亚康复医疗服务及医保支付制度的经验与启示[J]. 中国卫生经济,2023,42(10):92. |
[8] | 李曼. 美国康复医保支付方式的发展与启示[J]. 中国卫生经济,2021,40(11):89. |
[9] | 安磊,么莉,王凯,等. 美国医保支付制度改革对我国康复护理服务的启示[J]. 中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(4):9. |
[10] | 李文瑾, 续晓方, 田立启, 等. 基于DRG的乳腺癌手术患者住院费用及影响因素分析[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2021, 38 (6): 76. |
[11] | TANG D F, BIAN J W, HE M Het al. Research on the Current Situation and Countermeasures of Inpatient Cost and Medical Insurance Payment Method for Rehabilitation Services in City S. [J]. Fronties in Public Health,2022 (10): 880951. |
[12] | 陈勇,贾晓倩,王珩,等. DRG支付方式下分级诊疗现状与策略研究[J]. 中国医院,2023,27(10):44. |
[13] | 胡琳琳,龙飞,李佳,等. 康复病组按价值付费的“长沙模式”[J]. 中国医疗保险,2022(6):74. |
[14] | 胡琳琳,邵宁军,支梦佳,等. 急性后期康复护理医保支付制度改革的实践探索—以浙江省金华市为例[J]. 卫生经济研究,2021,38(12):11. |
[15] | 李中齐,林汉城,张颖,等. 以医保支付方式改革促进康复医疗服务体系构建的路径探析—以深圳市为例[J]. 中国医疗保险,2022(4):86. |
[16] | 王庆,吴宏,程静.我国急性后期康复护理医保支付改革试点的典型模式比较分析[J].经济研究导刊,2024,(17):128. |
[17] | 王萱萱,励建安,魏小雷,等.以价值为导向的住院康复服务价值调节因子构建研究[J].中国卫生政策研究,2024,17(3):48. |
[18] | 励建安,刘守国. 以功能改善为核心的医疗保险和长护险评价与支付思路[J]. 中国医疗保险,2021,150(3):24. |
[19] | 高京,欧阳江峰,孙强,等. 山东省长期护理保险实施现状与思考[J]. 中国医疗保险,2022(11):60. |
[20] | 韩璐,褚福灵.长期护理保险制度国际经验与反思—以日本、德国、美国为例[J].北京劳动保障职业学院学报,2020,14(3):31. |
[21] | 于新亮,左雅璇,孙洪波,等. 长期护理保险对医疗费用及医保基金可持续性的影响研究[J]. 中国医疗保险,2023(9):55. |
[22] | 盛政,李月霞,阮艺华. 建立以功能相关分类为基础的康复住院医保支付方式的探索与思考[J]. 中国医疗保险,2018,122(11):45. |
[23] | 李晓轩,叶睿雪,王昱棋,等.分级诊疗背景下康复患者双向转诊现状及对策研究[J].卫生软科学,2024,38(10):84. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |